TOKENOMICS
Shared exchange
economics.
55% of eligible protocol fees goes to participants. Two staking pools. A choice in how you participate.
MORE PARTICIPANTS.
A SHARED ECONOMY.
To participants.
The participant allocation is divided 80/20 between swiftX and SWIFT staking.
80% of participant allocation.
20% of participant allocation.
Retained by the platform.
Each user’s rewards are proportional to their eligible stake within the relevant pool.
EXPLORE THE SPLIT
See where the fees go.
A simple illustration of the allocation—not a revenue or return forecast.
Collective pool amounts, not individual earnings. At 1% of eligible swiftX stake, your fee-pool share in this example would be $44.00. Qualifying bankroll surplus is a separate stream.
CONVERT BY CHOICE
Deflationary by conversion.
The same rights per unit.
Permanently burning SWIFT mints 50% of the swiftX an equivalent qualifying trading loss would mint, based on SWIFT’s reference value at conversion.
Once staked, those swiftX units have the same reward rights as loss-earned units. The 50% applies to the mint quantity—not the rewards per unit.
Read the conversion mechanicsTRY THE MECHANICS
A one-way choice.
See how converting a portion of your SWIFT changes what you retain. This is a visual illustration—not a transaction or an exchange-rate quote.
swiftX received = 50% × Q(V)
Q(V) is the qualifying-loss mint quote for the burned SWIFT’s reference value. Actual output depends on the emission curve and reference price.
Illustration only · no tokens are burned.
THE IMPORTANT DISTINCTIONS
Are 44% and 11% yield rates?
No. They are the collective shares of total eligible protocol fees allocated to each staking pool. They are not an APY, not a fixed return and not a guarantee of individual earnings.
Does staking reduce the SWIFT supply?
Staking alone does not burn SWIFT. Only a genuine burn permanently removes tokens from supply. Withdrawal conditions are a separate launch configuration.
How is the fixed supply allocated?
The exact initial SWIFT supply quantity, launch allocations and vesting are not published in this design edition. No allocation chart is invented here. See the parameter schedule in the documentation for pending launch decisions.
What about Ethereum and HyperEVM?
SWIFT is specified on Ethereum mainnet, while the trading and swiftX staking design is on HyperEVM. Fee delivery and one-time recognition of SWIFT burns need a verified cross-network settlement design before launch.